Music copyright issues
[Users questions | Browse:28 | Favorites]
Users questions:Why Baidu is not the defendant had some time ago, what has so many songs copyright interconnection how online operators, ah, nobody ah? How to use the music they will not disappoint Copyright select (non-commercial What on-line?)
Experts answer: Shanghai Busheng Music Culture Media Co. v. Baidu infringement case the company has first-instance ruling: Baidu lost. But the 100Degree of the company that the Court of Guan Yu "stop Baidu site in relation to the original action side of the 30 many more MP3 songs download service" Juyou unenforceability, the decision Duiyubaokuo Baidu and other search companies Zainei search space will be incalculable impact. So far, no similar sentence at home and abroadCases. Universal Music, EMI, Warner Music, Sony BMG and their subsidiaries in China and due east Cinepoly record followed also filed suit against Baidu's search engine infringed the copyright of their hundreds of songs. Analysts believe that the record companies sue Baidu's ultimate goal is to force 100Degree step followed the closure of its MP3 Netease search service. Intellectual property protection is necessary, of course, it is now vigorously promoting a project. The ultimate goal of intellectual property protection is also to protect the means to promote the development of new technologies. The protection and promotion of the meeting point where the industry has been the focus of discussion.Fang Xingdong words, a court might be outside on behalf of others ideas. Baidu loses Internet intellectual property protection in China created an extreme case which means that China's "Copyright Protection radical" forces in a comprehensive victory, means that a developing country like China in IPR protectionExtent far beyond the actual start line to the U.S. overall. This is a very small number of global music giant market, justice and the operation of a great victory for public opinion. The price of victory is the Internet industry interests and the interests of Internet users as a cost. Thus, Baidu is not just a company's lost lost, butLosing the entire Internet industry is losing all the netizens. The first functional link is the Internet, the Internet's basic lifeline, linking the fundamental forces of freedom and openness is the fundamental guarantee of the Internet, but also the basic driving force. Just think, if there is no link, the Internet will look like? InternetLinks are great constraints and limitations of the Internet will look like? "Link on the infringement" of copyright protection jurisprudence is indeed worthy of celebration of a major victory, but also a fundamental link to the free Internet, the cost of great loss. In other words, after the person using the "link" function, it also must beCourt identification of the same ability to judge whether the content being linked illegal. Otherwise, do not lightly use the "link" function, because if it is linked object is illegal (Music Ye Hao, articles Ye Hao, the contents of all links to be considering legal issues), you will also be subject to legal sanctions. Basic InternetLoss of free will, each person using the link will lose basic legal sense of security. This is the Internet, the users will be what a great loss. Protection of music, held to upload unauthorized music will have enough sources, why stretch serious harm "link" free extreme? AndIntellectual property rights protection mechanisms at the other end - the public interest, but lost the fundamental force of public opinion. Yes, intellectual property rights must be protected. However, this must be a reasonable degree of protection is a basic balance of interests. What should have a "degree." Otherwise, it goes on, one day, to a small number of musical giantsInterests, the law can be pushed to a higher level of protection the extreme: who download unauthorized music should be shot! If that day comes, the global music giant, of course, a few laugh, highly praised the brilliant intellectual property protection. However, the public lost much? Industry lost much? Community has lost how many?"Greed" of intellectual property rights activism, and complete laissez-faire does not protect the "piracy right" compared to the harm likely to be more severe and serious. In the end, all of us losing more and more basic freedoms and rights. To protect intellectual property rights under the banner of high-sounding, musical giant of minorityStrangle the Internet with conspiracy in the fundamental lifeline: a reasonable, open and free sharing! It goes on, the final picture will be how the Internet?
Experts answer: Shanghai Busheng Music Culture Media Co. v. Baidu infringement case the company has first-instance ruling: Baidu lost. But the 100Degree of the company that the Court of Guan Yu "stop Baidu site in relation to the original action side of the 30 many more MP3 songs download service" Juyou unenforceability, the decision Duiyubaokuo Baidu and other search companies Zainei search space will be incalculable impact. So far, no similar sentence at home and abroadCases. Universal Music, EMI, Warner Music, Sony BMG and their subsidiaries in China and due east Cinepoly record followed also filed suit against Baidu's search engine infringed the copyright of their hundreds of songs. Analysts believe that the record companies sue Baidu's ultimate goal is to force 100Degree step followed the closure of its MP3 Netease search service. Intellectual property protection is necessary, of course, it is now vigorously promoting a project. The ultimate goal of intellectual property protection is also to protect the means to promote the development of new technologies. The protection and promotion of the meeting point where the industry has been the focus of discussion.Fang Xingdong words, a court might be outside on behalf of others ideas. Baidu loses Internet intellectual property protection in China created an extreme case which means that China's "Copyright Protection radical" forces in a comprehensive victory, means that a developing country like China in IPR protectionExtent far beyond the actual start line to the U.S. overall. This is a very small number of global music giant market, justice and the operation of a great victory for public opinion. The price of victory is the Internet industry interests and the interests of Internet users as a cost. Thus, Baidu is not just a company's lost lost, butLosing the entire Internet industry is losing all the netizens. The first functional link is the Internet, the Internet's basic lifeline, linking the fundamental forces of freedom and openness is the fundamental guarantee of the Internet, but also the basic driving force. Just think, if there is no link, the Internet will look like? InternetLinks are great constraints and limitations of the Internet will look like? "Link on the infringement" of copyright protection jurisprudence is indeed worthy of celebration of a major victory, but also a fundamental link to the free Internet, the cost of great loss. In other words, after the person using the "link" function, it also must beCourt identification of the same ability to judge whether the content being linked illegal. Otherwise, do not lightly use the "link" function, because if it is linked object is illegal (Music Ye Hao, articles Ye Hao, the contents of all links to be considering legal issues), you will also be subject to legal sanctions. Basic InternetLoss of free will, each person using the link will lose basic legal sense of security. This is the Internet, the users will be what a great loss. Protection of music, held to upload unauthorized music will have enough sources, why stretch serious harm "link" free extreme? AndIntellectual property rights protection mechanisms at the other end - the public interest, but lost the fundamental force of public opinion. Yes, intellectual property rights must be protected. However, this must be a reasonable degree of protection is a basic balance of interests. What should have a "degree." Otherwise, it goes on, one day, to a small number of musical giantsInterests, the law can be pushed to a higher level of protection the extreme: who download unauthorized music should be shot! If that day comes, the global music giant, of course, a few laugh, highly praised the brilliant intellectual property protection. However, the public lost much? Industry lost much? Community has lost how many?"Greed" of intellectual property rights activism, and complete laissez-faire does not protect the "piracy right" compared to the harm likely to be more severe and serious. In the end, all of us losing more and more basic freedoms and rights. To protect intellectual property rights under the banner of high-sounding, musical giant of minorityStrangle the Internet with conspiracy in the fundamental lifeline: a reasonable, open and free sharing! It goes on, the final picture will be how the Internet?
- I always say that the user does not exist UC2008
- Web page video display problem
- What general information pages available to the machine?
- How do I download a book are not
- How to download Yahoo network "yahoomessenger (Chinese version)?
- How to open a frame in another web page specified page (with frames pages)
- Mailbox in the 163, how to automatically remember the password for the mailbox and delete?
- Network video sound problems
- Internet address of the problem can not be found
- Requirements: how do I pay the master page
- This information provided by the users.Thanks!
Computer Knowledge Copyright 2005-2015 All Rights Reserved.